<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1189 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338109</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding non-payment of service tax on maintenance or repair services of computer software, citing limitation grounds and lack of clarity on tax liability. The order highlighted exemptions for certain services and the evolving nature of tax treatment in this area. It concluded that the demand for the extended period was not sustainable due to genuine doubts regarding tax liability, ultimately finding no willful evasion by the respondent. The appeal was dismissed on 30.12.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:07:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1189 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338109</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding non-payment of service tax on maintenance or repair services of computer software, citing limitation grounds and lack of clarity on tax liability. The order highlighted exemptions for certain services and the evolving nature of tax treatment in this area. It concluded that the demand for the extended period was not sustainable due to genuine doubts regarding tax liability, ultimately finding no willful evasion by the respondent. The appeal was dismissed on 30.12.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>