<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 205 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6553</link>
    <description>Failure to deposit tax deducted at source within the statutory time can attract criminal prosecution under the Income-tax Act, and a company is not exempt from such liability merely because it is a juristic person. Where the complaint contains averments that directors were principal officers or were in charge of and responsible for the company&#039;s business, the prosecution against them is maintainable at the threshold and the question of their actual responsibility is for trial. A plea of reasonable cause, including delayed payment after deduction, raises a defence requiring evidence and does not bar prosecution at the stage of discharge or quashing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 205 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6553</link>
      <description>Failure to deposit tax deducted at source within the statutory time can attract criminal prosecution under the Income-tax Act, and a company is not exempt from such liability merely because it is a juristic person. Where the complaint contains averments that directors were principal officers or were in charge of and responsible for the company&#039;s business, the prosecution against them is maintainable at the threshold and the question of their actual responsibility is for trial. A plea of reasonable cause, including delayed payment after deduction, raises a defence requiring evidence and does not bar prosecution at the stage of discharge or quashing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>