<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1183 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338103</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s entitlement to exemption benefits under Notification No. 3/2004-CE and Notification No. 108/95-CE for clearing M.S. Pipes without duty payment. The appellant was found to have met the requirements specified in the notifications, as the certificates did not need to be in favor of the appellant but needed to confirm the goods&#039; intended use. The Revenue&#039;s challenge was dismissed, and the appeal was rejected, affirming the appellant&#039;s right to the exemptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1183 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338103</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s entitlement to exemption benefits under Notification No. 3/2004-CE and Notification No. 108/95-CE for clearing M.S. Pipes without duty payment. The appellant was found to have met the requirements specified in the notifications, as the certificates did not need to be in favor of the appellant but needed to confirm the goods&#039; intended use. The Revenue&#039;s challenge was dismissed, and the appeal was rejected, affirming the appellant&#039;s right to the exemptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>