<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1177 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338097</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, upholding the disallowance of credit on single leaf door and glazed view panel as specialized civil construction items. The decision also rejected setting aside the interest demand on irregularly availed credit, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) order. The assessee&#039;s cross objections were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:06:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1177 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338097</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, upholding the disallowance of credit on single leaf door and glazed view panel as specialized civil construction items. The decision also rejected setting aside the interest demand on irregularly availed credit, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) order. The assessee&#039;s cross objections were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>