<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1163 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338083</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to be invalid due to the defective show-cause notice that did not specify the grounds for penalty. The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer and allowed the appeal of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of clear communication in penalty notices to adhere to principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:49:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1163 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338083</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to be invalid due to the defective show-cause notice that did not specify the grounds for penalty. The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer and allowed the appeal of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of clear communication in penalty notices to adhere to principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>