<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1114 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189888</link>
    <description>The penalty under section 271(1)(C) for Assessment Year (A.Y.) 03-04 was deleted, while for A.Y. 04-05, it was partly allowed due to the debatable nature of additions and accuracy of particulars furnished. The ITAT directed the AO to calculate the penalty amount for the confirmed deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:28:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1114 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189888</link>
      <description>The penalty under section 271(1)(C) for Assessment Year (A.Y.) 03-04 was deleted, while for A.Y. 04-05, it was partly allowed due to the debatable nature of additions and accuracy of particulars furnished. The ITAT directed the AO to calculate the penalty amount for the confirmed deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>