<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1308 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189872</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Commissioner&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act was not justified as the Assessing Officer had conducted adequate inquiries and the assessment orders were not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue&#039;s interest. The Tribunal vacated the revision order and allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 15:11:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1308 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189872</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Commissioner&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act was not justified as the Assessing Officer had conducted adequate inquiries and the assessment orders were not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue&#039;s interest. The Tribunal vacated the revision order and allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>