<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1143 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338063</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the Private Limited Company, reversing the lower authorities&#039; decisions. It held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s mechanical application of Rule 8D without examining the accounts and recording dissatisfaction was improper. The Tribunal emphasized that no disallowance under Section 14A is warranted if no expenditure was incurred for earning exempt income. The order was pronounced on 18/01/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:35:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1143 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338063</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the Private Limited Company, reversing the lower authorities&#039; decisions. It held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s mechanical application of Rule 8D without examining the accounts and recording dissatisfaction was improper. The Tribunal emphasized that no disallowance under Section 14A is warranted if no expenditure was incurred for earning exempt income. The order was pronounced on 18/01/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>