<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1140 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338060</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the cross appeals by the assessee and the Revenue. The CIT(A)&#039;s order was upheld, granting partial relief to the assessee and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments regarding disallowance of business loss, deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e), bad debts, and interest expenses. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee on these issues, emphasizing the lack of material evidence to support the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2017 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1140 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338060</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the cross appeals by the assessee and the Revenue. The CIT(A)&#039;s order was upheld, granting partial relief to the assessee and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments regarding disallowance of business loss, deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e), bad debts, and interest expenses. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee on these issues, emphasizing the lack of material evidence to support the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>