https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338046 The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of goods valued at Rs. 70,11,835 under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Rule 15 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, as the show cause notice lacked a demand for duty. Consequently, penalties and redemption fine were deemed unsustainable, leading to their reversal and refund of the encashed bank guarantee amount. The appeal against the Order-in-Appeal was allowed, resulting in the cancellation of both the Order-in-Original and the Order-in-Appeal, with directions for refund and consequential relief. en-us Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:34:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338046 The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of goods valued at Rs. 70,11,835 under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Rule 15 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, as the show cause notice lacked a demand for duty. Consequently, penalties and redemption fine were deemed unsustainable, leading to their reversal and refund of the encashed bank guarantee amount. The appeal against the Order-in-Appeal was allowed, resulting in the cancellation of both the Order-in-Original and the Order-in-Appeal, with directions for refund and consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338046