<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1120 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338040</link>
    <description>The appeal focused on the import of Data Comp equipments seeking duty exemption under Notification No. 52/03-CUS. The Department denied the notification benefit, leading to penalties and interest imposed on the appellant. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding the Show Cause Notice issued beyond the statutory limitation period, rendering the proceedings time-barred. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside based on the limitation issue, and the appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:34:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1120 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338040</link>
      <description>The appeal focused on the import of Data Comp equipments seeking duty exemption under Notification No. 52/03-CUS. The Department denied the notification benefit, leading to penalties and interest imposed on the appellant. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding the Show Cause Notice issued beyond the statutory limitation period, rendering the proceedings time-barred. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside based on the limitation issue, and the appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>