https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338038 The court expunged unwarranted remarks against the petitioner's counsel and upheld the dropping of proceedings against the respondent under Section 245(2) Cr.P.C. The Appellate Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the charges against the respondent, leading to the exoneration based on merits. The court cited legal principles establishing that exoneration in adjudication proceedings on merits can bar criminal prosecution on the same facts. Consequently, the court found no issue with dropping the proceedings against the respondent. en-us Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Aug 2017 15:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338038 The court expunged unwarranted remarks against the petitioner's counsel and upheld the dropping of proceedings against the respondent under Section 245(2) Cr.P.C. The Appellate Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the charges against the respondent, leading to the exoneration based on merits. The court cited legal principles establishing that exoneration in adjudication proceedings on merits can bar criminal prosecution on the same facts. Consequently, the court found no issue with dropping the proceedings against the respondent. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338038