<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1118 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338038</link>
    <description>Criminal prosecution may be terminated where the accused has been exonerated on merits in customs adjudication on the same factual foundation and the material does not sustain the allegation. The Delhi High Court noted that, although adjudication and prosecution are generally independent, continuation of the criminal case in such circumstances would amount to an abuse of process. It also found that the adverse remarks made against counsel were unnecessary and unsupported by the record, and ordered them expunged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1118 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338038</link>
      <description>Criminal prosecution may be terminated where the accused has been exonerated on merits in customs adjudication on the same factual foundation and the material does not sustain the allegation. The Delhi High Court noted that, although adjudication and prosecution are generally independent, continuation of the criminal case in such circumstances would amount to an abuse of process. It also found that the adverse remarks made against counsel were unnecessary and unsupported by the record, and ordered them expunged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>