https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338035 The NCLT concluded that the respondents did not willfully disobey the court's order by issuing a requisition notice for an EGM to remove R11 from the board of directors. The tribunal found that the consent order did not explicitly restrain the respondents from taking such actions, dismissing the contempt application. The parties were granted the liberty to address the issue of R11's removal in affidavits to be heard alongside the main company petition, ensuring democratic rights were upheld. The matter was listed for further hearing as planned. en-us Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338035 The NCLT concluded that the respondents did not willfully disobey the court's order by issuing a requisition notice for an EGM to remove R11 from the board of directors. The tribunal found that the consent order did not explicitly restrain the respondents from taking such actions, dismissing the contempt application. The parties were granted the liberty to address the issue of R11's removal in affidavits to be heard alongside the main company petition, ensuring democratic rights were upheld. The matter was listed for further hearing as planned. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338035