<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (11) TMI 329 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189863</link>
    <description>The Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 was treated as governing only profit-based bonus and matters connected with that statutory scheme, so it did not extinguish customary or contractual bonus outside its field. Attendance bonus, established by long usage and paid before the Act, was held to remain separately payable in addition to the statutory bonus. The prior decision relied on by the High Court was read as not ruling that all other forms of bonus were displaced by the Act, and the High Court was therefore wrong to set aside the award.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (11) TMI 329 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189863</link>
      <description>The Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 was treated as governing only profit-based bonus and matters connected with that statutory scheme, so it did not extinguish customary or contractual bonus outside its field. Attendance bonus, established by long usage and paid before the Act, was held to remain separately payable in addition to the statutory bonus. The prior decision relied on by the High Court was read as not ruling that all other forms of bonus were displaced by the Act, and the High Court was therefore wrong to set aside the award.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>