<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (4) TMI 162 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189861</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court ruled in a case involving the interpretation of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, as amended by Act 23 of 1976. The Court held that the 1976 amendment did not nullify customary bonuses, emphasizing that the Act primarily addressed profit-oriented bonuses and did not govern customary, traditional, or contractual bonuses. The Court distinguished between statutory bonuses under the Act and customary bonuses, concluding that they operated in separate spheres and did not conflict. The appeal challenging the legality of customary bonuses under the 1976 amendment was dismissed, with each party bearing their respective costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (4) TMI 162 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189861</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court ruled in a case involving the interpretation of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, as amended by Act 23 of 1976. The Court held that the 1976 amendment did not nullify customary bonuses, emphasizing that the Act primarily addressed profit-oriented bonuses and did not govern customary, traditional, or contractual bonuses. The Court distinguished between statutory bonuses under the Act and customary bonuses, concluding that they operated in separate spheres and did not conflict. The appeal challenging the legality of customary bonuses under the 1976 amendment was dismissed, with each party bearing their respective costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>