<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 793 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189859</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under s. 260A of the IT Act against the Tribunal&#039;s order for the assessment year 1995-96. The Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing depreciation at 40% on leased vehicles was upheld, as no new information warranted reassessment under s. 147(a). The Court found no substantial question of law to consider.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:05:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 793 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189859</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under s. 260A of the IT Act against the Tribunal&#039;s order for the assessment year 1995-96. The Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing depreciation at 40% on leased vehicles was upheld, as no new information warranted reassessment under s. 147(a). The Court found no substantial question of law to consider.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>