<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 1104 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189851</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petitions, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s oversight of the investigation in the Aircel Maxis Case as a reason for its inability to entertain them. The petitioners were directed to seek redressal from the Supreme Court, leading to the dismissal of related miscellaneous petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:46:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 1104 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189851</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petitions, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s oversight of the investigation in the Aircel Maxis Case as a reason for its inability to entertain them. The petitioners were directed to seek redressal from the Supreme Court, leading to the dismissal of related miscellaneous petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>