<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1518 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189852</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order for Assessment Year 2005-06. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on transfer pricing, confirming the use of the Transaction Net Margin Method (TNMM) over the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method. The Court emphasized the importance of considering export benefits in turnover for accurate comparison and found no need for Transfer Pricing adjustment as profit margin variances were within the safe harbor limit. The appeal was ultimately rejected, with the Court affirming the Tribunal&#039;s order and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:46:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1518 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189852</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order for Assessment Year 2005-06. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on transfer pricing, confirming the use of the Transaction Net Margin Method (TNMM) over the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method. The Court emphasized the importance of considering export benefits in turnover for accurate comparison and found no need for Transfer Pricing adjustment as profit margin variances were within the safe harbor limit. The appeal was ultimately rejected, with the Court affirming the Tribunal&#039;s order and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>