https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189841 A challenge to a Selection Committee recommendation was barred by waiver where the appellant knew the relevant facts but participated in the interview without objecting to the committee's constitution. The governing bias test remained whether there was a reasonable apprehension of bias, not proof of actual bias, and bias in a selection process may affect deliberations subtly. The writ challenge was also premature because further statutory scrutiny and other remedies were still available, so the recommendation had not yet attained final effect. The challenge therefore failed and the writ petition and appeal were not maintainable at that stage. en-us Wed, 28 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jun 2025 14:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189841 A challenge to a Selection Committee recommendation was barred by waiver where the appellant knew the relevant facts but participated in the interview without objecting to the committee's constitution. The governing bias test remained whether there was a reasonable apprehension of bias, not proof of actual bias, and bias in a selection process may affect deliberations subtly. The writ challenge was also premature because further statutory scrutiny and other remedies were still available, so the recommendation had not yet attained final effect. The challenge therefore failed and the writ petition and appeal were not maintainable at that stage. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189841