<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1234 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189838</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Ld CIT(A)&#039;s order deleting Rs. 56 lakhs under section 68 of the IT Act and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. The Ld CIT(A) was directed to assess the reasonableness of receiving high premium shares and the genuineness of the transaction, allowing both parties a fair hearing. The revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2023 20:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1234 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189838</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Ld CIT(A)&#039;s order deleting Rs. 56 lakhs under section 68 of the IT Act and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. The Ld CIT(A) was directed to assess the reasonableness of receiving high premium shares and the genuineness of the transaction, allowing both parties a fair hearing. The revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>