<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (12) TMI 7 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6532</link>
    <description>Decisions rejecting applications made after a rule has been issued in reference proceedings under the Income-tax Act require a reasoned order; absence of stated reasons renders the decision without the necessary reasoned foundation and invalid. The operative effect is that such orders must be set aside and remitted for fresh disposal with reasons, ensuring the applicant receives adjudication based on articulated grounds rather than an unexplained rejection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (12) TMI 7 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6532</link>
      <description>Decisions rejecting applications made after a rule has been issued in reference proceedings under the Income-tax Act require a reasoned order; absence of stated reasons renders the decision without the necessary reasoned foundation and invalid. The operative effect is that such orders must be set aside and remitted for fresh disposal with reasons, ensuring the applicant receives adjudication based on articulated grounds rather than an unexplained rejection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>