<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1095 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338015</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing reassessment of disallowances under section 40A(3) and restricting expense disallowance to cash payments only. The addition of notional interest was deleted, emphasizing no cost to the company. The Tribunal clarified that disallowances under section 40A(3) should be based on individual payments exceeding the limit. The disallowance of expenses due to lack of supporting bills was reduced to 7% for cash payments only.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2017 08:55:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1095 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338015</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing reassessment of disallowances under section 40A(3) and restricting expense disallowance to cash payments only. The addition of notional interest was deleted, emphasizing no cost to the company. The Tribunal clarified that disallowances under section 40A(3) should be based on individual payments exceeding the limit. The disallowance of expenses due to lack of supporting bills was reduced to 7% for cash payments only.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>