https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338002 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal against the recovery of CENVAT credit, interest, and penalty. While acknowledging the merit against the appellant, the Tribunal sided with them on the limitation issue due to the lack of proof of suppression of facts. The appellant's timely disclosure in returns and good faith belief in entitlement to the credit played a crucial role in the decision. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant with any consequential relief. en-us Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Jan 2017 08:54:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338002 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal against the recovery of CENVAT credit, interest, and penalty. While acknowledging the merit against the appellant, the Tribunal sided with them on the limitation issue due to the lack of proof of suppression of facts. The appellant's timely disclosure in returns and good faith belief in entitlement to the credit played a crucial role in the decision. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant with any consequential relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338002