<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1080 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338000</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the service tax demand but set aside penalties under Section 76 and Section 78. The appellant&#039;s argument for exemption based on charges related to handling export cargo was partially accepted, noting the lack of specific figures to substantiate the exempted services. The Tribunal emphasized the need for separate accounts for exempted services and upheld service tax liability for non-export cargo-related services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2017 08:54:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1080 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338000</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the service tax demand but set aside penalties under Section 76 and Section 78. The appellant&#039;s argument for exemption based on charges related to handling export cargo was partially accepted, noting the lack of specific figures to substantiate the exempted services. The Tribunal emphasized the need for separate accounts for exempted services and upheld service tax liability for non-export cargo-related services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>