https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337996 The Tribunal held that the appellant's reversal of proportionate credit for input services used in manufacturing exempted goods complied with the retrospective amendment to Rule 6 of CCR, 2004. The Tribunal found the appellant's method of calculating credit attributable to exempted goods based on turnover ratios to be sufficient. Relying on previous decisions, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with necessary relief. en-us Tue, 06 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337996 The Tribunal held that the appellant's reversal of proportionate credit for input services used in manufacturing exempted goods complied with the retrospective amendment to Rule 6 of CCR, 2004. The Tribunal found the appellant's method of calculating credit attributable to exempted goods based on turnover ratios to be sufficient. Relying on previous decisions, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with necessary relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337996