https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337993 The appeal was filed against the denial of CENVAT credit on outward freight but allowance on courier services. The Commissioner (A) allowed credit on courier services but denied it on outward transportation, citing the appellant's use of Goods Transport Agency services. The appellant argued that the denial was legally unsustainable, meeting conditions for credit as per CBEC Circular No.97/8/2007-ST. The judicial member set aside the order, remanding the case for a reasoned decision ensuring compliance with natural justice principles and allowing the appellant to provide supporting documents for the FOR sale claim. en-us Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Jan 2017 08:54:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337993 The appeal was filed against the denial of CENVAT credit on outward freight but allowance on courier services. The Commissioner (A) allowed credit on courier services but denied it on outward transportation, citing the appellant's use of Goods Transport Agency services. The appellant argued that the denial was legally unsustainable, meeting conditions for credit as per CBEC Circular No.97/8/2007-ST. The judicial member set aside the order, remanding the case for a reasoned decision ensuring compliance with natural justice principles and allowing the appellant to provide supporting documents for the FOR sale claim. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337993