https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337991 The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed on the appellants under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, for receiving goods on which Excise duty was evaded. The appeal against the Order-in-Appeal was dismissed, as it was established that the appellants were subject to penalties for dealing with goods liable for confiscation, despite their argument of abetment. The decision was based on the provisions of the rule and the facts of the case, leading to the affirmation of penalties by the Tribunal. en-us Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Dec 2017 16:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337991 The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed on the appellants under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, for receiving goods on which Excise duty was evaded. The appeal against the Order-in-Appeal was dismissed, as it was established that the appellants were subject to penalties for dealing with goods liable for confiscation, despite their argument of abetment. The decision was based on the provisions of the rule and the facts of the case, leading to the affirmation of penalties by the Tribunal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337991