<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 618 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189831</link>
    <description>An appointment obtained by false residence particulars and suppression of material facts may be cancelled without a further hearing where the relevant facts are admitted and the person has already been given notice and earlier opportunities to explain. The material showed that the appointee was a permanent resident of Haryana, that the caste certificate reflected Rajasthan residence, and that the falsehood constituted fraud. In those circumstances, the Supreme Court held that natural justice did not require repetition as a rigid formula, facts admitted needed no further proof, and interference with the cancellation order was unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 618 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189831</link>
      <description>An appointment obtained by false residence particulars and suppression of material facts may be cancelled without a further hearing where the relevant facts are admitted and the person has already been given notice and earlier opportunities to explain. The material showed that the appointee was a permanent resident of Haryana, that the caste certificate reflected Rajasthan residence, and that the falsehood constituted fraud. In those circumstances, the Supreme Court held that natural justice did not require repetition as a rigid formula, facts admitted needed no further proof, and interference with the cancellation order was unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>