<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1270 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189824</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for AY 2008-09 by limiting the disallowance to a reasonable amount and fully allowed the appeal for AY 2009-10, ruling that no disallowance under Section 14A can occur in the absence of exempt income. The Tribunal stressed the importance of the AO recording satisfaction based on account examinations and cautioned against mechanically applying Rule 8D to prevent unreasonable outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2017 17:58:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1270 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189824</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for AY 2008-09 by limiting the disallowance to a reasonable amount and fully allowed the appeal for AY 2009-10, ruling that no disallowance under Section 14A can occur in the absence of exempt income. The Tribunal stressed the importance of the AO recording satisfaction based on account examinations and cautioned against mechanically applying Rule 8D to prevent unreasonable outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>