<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (8) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6518</link>
    <description>SC examined the validity of a reassessment notice under Income Tax Act section 148. The court determined that audit department notes constitute valid &quot;information&quot; for reopening an assessment. The notice was found legitimate, as the audit department can provide legal insights leading to reassessment. The appeal was allowed, affirming the Income-tax Officer&#039;s authority to reexamine the original tax assessment based on new information.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (8) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6518</link>
      <description>SC examined the validity of a reassessment notice under Income Tax Act section 148. The court determined that audit department notes constitute valid &quot;information&quot; for reopening an assessment. The notice was found legitimate, as the audit department can provide legal insights leading to reassessment. The appeal was allowed, affirming the Income-tax Officer&#039;s authority to reexamine the original tax assessment based on new information.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>