<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1052 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337972</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the petition challenging the ITAT order, which refused rectification of the previous order. The petitioner argued that a crucial decision was not considered, but the Court held that all relevant matters were addressed by the ITAT. Emphasizing the finality of the tribunal&#039;s findings, the Court rejected the petitioner&#039;s claim for rectification. Despite citing legal precedents, the Court found no basis to interfere with the ITAT&#039;s decision. The Court did not address other aspects of the ITAT&#039;s order, deeming them irrelevant to the case. The petition was dismissed without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2017 07:33:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1052 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337972</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the petition challenging the ITAT order, which refused rectification of the previous order. The petitioner argued that a crucial decision was not considered, but the Court held that all relevant matters were addressed by the ITAT. Emphasizing the finality of the tribunal&#039;s findings, the Court rejected the petitioner&#039;s claim for rectification. Despite citing legal precedents, the Court found no basis to interfere with the ITAT&#039;s decision. The Court did not address other aspects of the ITAT&#039;s order, deeming them irrelevant to the case. The petition was dismissed without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>