<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1049 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337969</link>
    <description>The appeal of the assessee was allowed. The ITAT directed the AO to adjudicate the deduction under Section 80IA based on the initial assessment year opted by the assessee. Regarding the disallowance under Section 14A, the ITAT instructed the AO to consider only investments yielding exempt income for disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2017 07:33:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1049 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337969</link>
      <description>The appeal of the assessee was allowed. The ITAT directed the AO to adjudicate the deduction under Section 80IA based on the initial assessment year opted by the assessee. Regarding the disallowance under Section 14A, the ITAT instructed the AO to consider only investments yielding exempt income for disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>