<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1041 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337961</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, ruling that it was issued based on tangible material and with proper approvals. The petitioner&#039;s arguments regarding compliance with Section 151, the use of borrowed information, sufficiency of material for reopening assessment, and the applicability of precedents were all addressed, with the court finding in favor of the tax authorities. Consequently, the petition was dismissed, and any interim relief granted was vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1041 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337961</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, ruling that it was issued based on tangible material and with proper approvals. The petitioner&#039;s arguments regarding compliance with Section 151, the use of borrowed information, sufficiency of material for reopening assessment, and the applicability of precedents were all addressed, with the court finding in favor of the tax authorities. Consequently, the petition was dismissed, and any interim relief granted was vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>