<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (4) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6516</link>
    <description>A garnishee notice issued under the Estate Duty Act recovery machinery was valid where it required a tenant to pay rent due to the estate toward arrears of estate duty, and it was not invalid merely because the lessors were not named specifically or because no prior demand notice had been served on the accountable persons. The tenant was therefore bound to comply. However, penalty could not be imposed for non-compliance because the garnishee was not an assessee in default, and neither the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 nor the Estate Duty Act created a deeming fiction extending penalty liability to a garnishee. The penalty order was thus unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (4) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6516</link>
      <description>A garnishee notice issued under the Estate Duty Act recovery machinery was valid where it required a tenant to pay rent due to the estate toward arrears of estate duty, and it was not invalid merely because the lessors were not named specifically or because no prior demand notice had been served on the accountable persons. The tenant was therefore bound to comply. However, penalty could not be imposed for non-compliance because the garnishee was not an assessee in default, and neither the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 nor the Estate Duty Act created a deeming fiction extending penalty liability to a garnishee. The penalty order was thus unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>