<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1036 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337956</link>
    <description>The HC held that reopening of the assessment was invalid due to lack of proper application of mind by the sanctioning authority under Section 151 before issuing notice under Sections 147/148. The mere approval without recorded satisfaction was insufficient, rendering the sanction ritualistic and formal. The invocation of Section 68 to add amounts was also scrutinized. The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s findings and ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the reassessment notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1036 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337956</link>
      <description>The HC held that reopening of the assessment was invalid due to lack of proper application of mind by the sanctioning authority under Section 151 before issuing notice under Sections 147/148. The mere approval without recorded satisfaction was insufficient, rendering the sanction ritualistic and formal. The invocation of Section 68 to add amounts was also scrutinized. The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s findings and ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the reassessment notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>