<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1029 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337949</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee by supporting the non-inclusion of excise duty as income, as it was passed on to the Government Department. The decision emphasized the significance of legal precedents and settled laws in resolving tax disputes, rejecting challenges to the ITAT&#039;s interpretations and decisions on various issues related to income tax provisions and accounting treatments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1029 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337949</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee by supporting the non-inclusion of excise duty as income, as it was passed on to the Government Department. The decision emphasized the significance of legal precedents and settled laws in resolving tax disputes, rejecting challenges to the ITAT&#039;s interpretations and decisions on various issues related to income tax provisions and accounting treatments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>