<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1026 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337946</link>
    <description>Revenue neutrality, without supporting factual data, was not sufficient on its own to displace the allegation of short payment or to establish absence of intent to evade duty. Even so, on the facts, the discretionary relief under Section 80 was granted and the penalty under Section 78 was waived. The demand and other consequential components were left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2017 07:32:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1026 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337946</link>
      <description>Revenue neutrality, without supporting factual data, was not sufficient on its own to displace the allegation of short payment or to establish absence of intent to evade duty. Even so, on the facts, the discretionary relief under Section 80 was granted and the penalty under Section 78 was waived. The demand and other consequential components were left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>