https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337938 The court allowed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of the appeal by CESTAT, emphasizing the statutory right to an appellate remedy under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act. The court criticized CESTAT's reliance on pending writ petitions by other parties as a basis for dismissal, stressing the importance of providing reasons for decisions to ensure transparency and fairness. It directed CESTAT to promptly constitute a Bench, notify parties within six weeks, conduct an expeditious hearing, and issue final orders within three months. The court upheld the petitioner's right to approach a higher forum for correction on facts and law. en-us Tue, 06 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Aug 2017 14:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337938 The court allowed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of the appeal by CESTAT, emphasizing the statutory right to an appellate remedy under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act. The court criticized CESTAT's reliance on pending writ petitions by other parties as a basis for dismissal, stressing the importance of providing reasons for decisions to ensure transparency and fairness. It directed CESTAT to promptly constitute a Bench, notify parties within six weeks, conduct an expeditious hearing, and issue final orders within three months. The court upheld the petitioner's right to approach a higher forum for correction on facts and law. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 06 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337938