<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (3) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6513</link>
    <description>In penalty proceedings under income-tax law, concealment must be established by the revenue because such proceedings are quasi-criminal in nature. The record showed that one fixed deposit receipt was reflected in the assessee&#039;s balance-sheet, both deposits were included in wealth-tax returns as assets of the assessee, there was no proof of a valid gift to the wife, and the funds were later used for the assessee&#039;s benefit. On those facts, the deposits were treated as belonging to the assessee and the related income as taxable in its hands, so the material supported the finding that no referable question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (3) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6513</link>
      <description>In penalty proceedings under income-tax law, concealment must be established by the revenue because such proceedings are quasi-criminal in nature. The record showed that one fixed deposit receipt was reflected in the assessee&#039;s balance-sheet, both deposits were included in wealth-tax returns as assets of the assessee, there was no proof of a valid gift to the wife, and the funds were later used for the assessee&#039;s benefit. On those facts, the deposits were treated as belonging to the assessee and the related income as taxable in its hands, so the material supported the finding that no referable question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>