<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 726 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189796</link>
    <description>The Tribunal annulled the assessment due to the invalid reopening under section 148 of the IT Act, finding the AO&#039;s reasons insufficient to establish income evasion. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 4,32,331 as unexplained cash credit under section 68 was not addressed. The Tribunal concluded that the initiation of proceedings lacked jurisdiction, rendering the assessment null and void.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 17:03:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 726 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189796</link>
      <description>The Tribunal annulled the assessment due to the invalid reopening under section 148 of the IT Act, finding the AO&#039;s reasons insufficient to establish income evasion. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 4,32,331 as unexplained cash credit under section 68 was not addressed. The Tribunal concluded that the initiation of proceedings lacked jurisdiction, rendering the assessment null and void.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>