https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189787 A subsequent partition decree produced in appeal was treated as a material event affecting the landlords' subsisting interest in the suit shop. Because eviction for personal requirement depends on a continuing legal entitlement to seek possession, the appellate court had to examine the altered title position before sustaining the decree. The same changed interest also required reconsideration of the default ground, since the landlords' competence to continue the eviction proceedings could not be assumed without first determining the effect of the partition decree. The matter therefore required fresh adjudication in light of the subsequent event and its impact on maintainability and entitlement to eviction. en-us Tue, 07 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jan 2017 12:39:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189787 A subsequent partition decree produced in appeal was treated as a material event affecting the landlords' subsisting interest in the suit shop. Because eviction for personal requirement depends on a continuing legal entitlement to seek possession, the appellate court had to examine the altered title position before sustaining the decree. The same changed interest also required reconsideration of the default ground, since the landlords' competence to continue the eviction proceedings could not be assumed without first determining the effect of the partition decree. The matter therefore required fresh adjudication in light of the subsequent event and its impact on maintainability and entitlement to eviction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189787