<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 997 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337917</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty order imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act due to the vague notice issued under Section 274 and the inconsistent recording of satisfaction by the Assessing Officer. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, emphasizing the necessity of clear and specific charges in penalty proceedings to uphold principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 07:26:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 997 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337917</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty order imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act due to the vague notice issued under Section 274 and the inconsistent recording of satisfaction by the Assessing Officer. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, emphasizing the necessity of clear and specific charges in penalty proceedings to uphold principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>