<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 995 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337915</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Chamber Summons seeking an amendment to include an Arbitral award in a pending Income Tax Appeal. The appellant&#039;s request for exemption under Section 54F was denied by the Tribunal due to non-compliance with the statutory requirements regarding property acquisition. The Court found that the Arbitral award did not align with the original transaction intended for exemption, leading to the rejection of the proposed additional evidence. The Court emphasized the importance of introducing relevant evidence and fairness to the opposing party, ultimately ruling against the appellant&#039;s amendment application without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2017 13:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 995 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337915</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Chamber Summons seeking an amendment to include an Arbitral award in a pending Income Tax Appeal. The appellant&#039;s request for exemption under Section 54F was denied by the Tribunal due to non-compliance with the statutory requirements regarding property acquisition. The Court found that the Arbitral award did not align with the original transaction intended for exemption, leading to the rejection of the proposed additional evidence. The Court emphasized the importance of introducing relevant evidence and fairness to the opposing party, ultimately ruling against the appellant&#039;s amendment application without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>