<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 994 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337914</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The tribunal emphasized the importance of disclosing all income-related facts and establishing the bona fide nature of explanations offered. The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed, affirming the penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 07:26:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 994 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337914</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The tribunal emphasized the importance of disclosing all income-related facts and establishing the bona fide nature of explanations offered. The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed, affirming the penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>