<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 991 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337911</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was unjustified as the turnover was below the threshold for TDS deduction under section 194A. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to tax deduction provisions based on turnover limits to avoid erroneous disallowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 07:25:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 991 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337911</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was unjustified as the turnover was below the threshold for TDS deduction under section 194A. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to tax deduction provisions based on turnover limits to avoid erroneous disallowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>