<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 975 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337895</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the service tax demands for management, maintenance, and repair services, as well as site formation service. However, it upheld the service tax liability with interest for the construction of a residential complex and supply of tangible goods. Penalties imposed on the appellant for all services were waived, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 975 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337895</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the service tax demands for management, maintenance, and repair services, as well as site formation service. However, it upheld the service tax liability with interest for the construction of a residential complex and supply of tangible goods. Penalties imposed on the appellant for all services were waived, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>