<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 973 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337893</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras dismissed appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai, against Final Order Nos. 742 and 743/2010 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai. The appeals were withdrawn by the Department based on Ministry of Finance instructions to reduce government litigation by setting monetary limits for filing appeals. The Court acknowledged the existence of a substantial question of law but decided not to entertain appeals where the monetary impact is less than Rs. 15,00,000. Both appeals were dismissed as not pressed due to the insignificant tax effect, with costs not awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 07:24:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 973 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337893</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras dismissed appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai, against Final Order Nos. 742 and 743/2010 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai. The appeals were withdrawn by the Department based on Ministry of Finance instructions to reduce government litigation by setting monetary limits for filing appeals. The Court acknowledged the existence of a substantial question of law but decided not to entertain appeals where the monetary impact is less than Rs. 15,00,000. Both appeals were dismissed as not pressed due to the insignificant tax effect, with costs not awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>