<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 965 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337885</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the Writ Appeal, setting aside the orders of the Single Judge and the Commissioner (Appeals) due to the review being barred by limitation. The Court emphasized the significance of adhering to legal timelines and principles of natural justice in administrative proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 965 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337885</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the Writ Appeal, setting aside the orders of the Single Judge and the Commissioner (Appeals) due to the review being barred by limitation. The Court emphasized the significance of adhering to legal timelines and principles of natural justice in administrative proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>