<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 962 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337882</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals in line with the decision in the M/s AB Sugars Ltd case, affirming the tax liability assessment on the sugar mill and the denial of input tax credit based on applicable legal provisions and precedents. The Court upheld the assessment order of the Assessing Authority, including the levying of purchase tax on the appellant, and emphasized the importance of statutory provisions and the constitutional framework in determining tax utilization and legislative authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 07:23:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 962 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337882</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals in line with the decision in the M/s AB Sugars Ltd case, affirming the tax liability assessment on the sugar mill and the denial of input tax credit based on applicable legal provisions and precedents. The Court upheld the assessment order of the Assessing Authority, including the levying of purchase tax on the appellant, and emphasized the importance of statutory provisions and the constitutional framework in determining tax utilization and legislative authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>