<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1634 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189779</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the revision petition, remanding the case to the Tribunal for a fresh disposal. The Court emphasized the importance of considering all relevant records and maintaining judicial propriety in quasi-judicial proceedings, directing the Tribunal to review the case records, hear both parties, and make a decision by a specified date. This decision aimed to ensure a fair and thorough adjudication of the appeal by setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 20:46:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1634 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189779</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the revision petition, remanding the case to the Tribunal for a fresh disposal. The Court emphasized the importance of considering all relevant records and maintaining judicial propriety in quasi-judicial proceedings, directing the Tribunal to review the case records, hear both parties, and make a decision by a specified date. This decision aimed to ensure a fair and thorough adjudication of the appeal by setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>